The work presented in this paper is intended to
introduce to both IPv4 and IPv6. The paper its main aim is to
perform an unbiased empirical performance analysis between the
two protocol stacks (IPv4 and IPv6), and how it related to the
performance on identical settings. Here two OSs (W2Kand Linux
Ubuntu)are configured with the two versions of IP and
empirically evaluated for performance difference. Here
performance related metrics throughputis empirically measured
on P2P test-bedimplementation. The results show that network
performance depends not only on IP version and traffic type, but
also on the choice of the OS. Our empirical evaluation proved
that IPv6 is not yet a mature enough technology. The
performance of IPv6 in many cases proved to be worse than
IPv4, incurring an overhead much higher than its anticipated
theoreticalcounterpart.
Mr.T.Vengatesh : was born in
Virudhunagar, Tamilnadu, India. he got
the Bachelor of Computer Application
Degree (BCA) from Madurai Kamaraj
University, Madurai in 2009. he
achieved the Master of Computer
Application Degree (MCA) from Anna
University, Chennai in 2012. especially
studied and finished the thesis by Cell
Selection in 4G Network in September,
2014, he got M.Phil (CS) degree from
Bharathidasan University , Trichy. Her
field of interest is Computer Networkt. He was doing Ph.D in
Computer Science from Bharathiar University ,coimbattur. he
works as a Head of the Department, Department of MCA at
VPMM Arts & Science College for women, Krishnankoil,
Sriviilliputtur(tk), Virudhunagar(D), Tamilnadu, India sinec 2014.
Dr.S.ThabasuKannan : has been
working as Professor and Principal in
Pannai College of Engineering and
Technology, Sivagangai and rendered
his valuable services for more than two
decades in various executive positions.
He has published more than 50
research level papers in various
refereed International/National level
journals/proceedings. He has authored
11 text/reference books on the
information technology. He has received 11 awards in appreciation
of his excellence in the field of research/education. He has visited
5 countries to present his research papers/articles in various
foreign universities. He has been acting as consultant for training
activities at Meenakshi Trust, Madurai. His area of interest is Big
data applications for bioinformatics applications. Under his
guidance 8 Ph.d scholars pursuing and more than 150 M.Phil
scholars were awarded. His several research papers have been
cited in various citations.
Concert Estimation
IPV4
IPV6
We came to the conclusion that the IPv6 protocol stack
needs much improvement to reduce the overhead. Since IPv6 is still maturing, perhaps it is just a matter of time
until its performance will finally reflect its theoretical
counterpart. We must admit that the toughest part of our
work was in configuring the routers. It is very
cumbersome and has many bugs with poor documentation
and user feedback. In the next paper, we plan to use IBM
router and Ericson router as test bed. And also we have
proposed to review on the basis of various transition
mechanisms. IPv6 also supports prioritizing packets,
which might be an easy way to offer a lighter version of
QoS without specifying any requirements. According to
our evaluation, IPv6 has a performance deficit when
utilizing traditional data streams. This paper has shown
that the performance of IPv4 and IPv6depends on the OS.
The extent to which performance related metrics
valuesdiffer depends on the OS.In near future, this paper
can be extended to incorporate more OSs including server
environments.
[1] S. Bradner, A. Mankin, “IP: Next Generation (IPng)
White Paper Solicitation,” Internet Engineering Task
Force, December 2006.
[2] P. Srisuresh, M. Holdrege, “IP Network Address
Translator (NAT) Terminology and Considerations,”,
Internet Engineering Task Force, August 2008.
[3] Dr.S.ThabasuKannan“Packet delay performance
evaluation in IPv4/IPv6 networks” International
Journal of P2P Network Trends and Technology Vol-2,
Iss-4, Jul 2012.
[4] Dr.S.ThabasuKannan “Jitter for evaluating the
performance of IPv4/IPv6 Networks” International
Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research
(IJSER) - (ISSN 2229-5518) Volume 3, Issue 9,
September 2012
[5] B. Carpenter, C. Jung, “Transmission of IPv6 over
IPv4 Domains without Explicit Tunnels,”, Internet
Engineering Task Force, March 2009.
[6] Karuppiah, EttikanKandasamy, et al. “Application
Performance Analysis in Transition Mechanism from
IPv4 to IPv6”. Research & Business Development
Department, Faculty of Information Technology,
Multimedia University (MMU), Jalan Multimedia,
June 2009.
[7] Draves, Richard P., et al. “Implementing IPv6 for
Windows NT”, Proceedings of the 2nd USENIX
Windows NT Symposium, Seattle, WA, August 3-4,
2009.
[8] Seiji Ariga, Kengo Nagahashi, Asaki Minami, Hiroshi
Esaki, Jun Murai. “Performance Evaluation of Data
Transmission Using IPSec over IPv6 Networks”, INET
2006 Proceedings, Japan, July 18th, 2009
[9] Peter Ping Xie. “Network Protocol Performance
Evaluation of IPv6 for Windows NT”, Master Thesis,
California Polytechnic State University, San Luis
Obispo, June 2009. [10] EttikanKandasamyKaruppiah. “IPv6 Dual Stack
Transition Technique Performance Analysis”, October
2009.
