Wireless Sensor Networks have formed new
opportunities across the variety of human efforts including
engineering design, forest fire tracking, and battlefield
surveillance. It is a group of sensor nodes that comprised of
sensing, computing, and communication elements that gives
an administrator the ability to observe and react to events
and phenomena in a specified environment. Minimizing
Energy consumption is considered as one of the most
important principles in the development of routing protocols
for Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN). This research paper
describes the characteristics of hierarchical routing scheme
for sensor network Low Energy Adaptive Clustering
hierarchy (LEACH) and Location Aware Cluster Based
Routing Protocol (LACBRP) based on the performance
matrices like Energy Values, Latency Values, Packet
Delivery Ratio and Residual Energy Values. This
comparative study proves that LACBRP performs well than
LEACH routing scheme.
Mrs. Hrituparna Paul : received her Master of Technology from
Tripura University (A Central University) in 2011 and Bachelor of
Technology from West Bengal University of Technology in 2009. She
has served as an Assistant Professor of NIT Agartala in the
Department of Computer Science & Engineering since 2013 to 2015.
Currently she is working as a PhD Scholar in the Department of
Computer Science of Assam University (A Central University). She
has several publications in various reputed journals and conferences
and has authored one book and many book chapters.
Dr. Prodipto Das : received his PhD and Msc both from Assam
University from the Department of Computer Science. He is currently
working as an Assistant Professor in the Department of Computer
Science, Assam University. He has several publications in various
reputed journals and conferences.
LEACH
LACBRP
Routing
Wireless Sensor
Network
This paper presents the results of the experiments carried
out on Wireless Sensor Network routing protocols
LEACH and LACBRP. The performance analysis is made
to verify the effect of mobility on the factors Energy
Values, Latency Values, Packet Delivery Ratio and
Residual Energy Values. Experimental results show that
LACBRP better utilizes than LEACH routing scheme.
[1] Shio kumar ,singh,MP singh, and DK singh. ?A
Survey of Energy- Efficient Hierarchical Cluster-
Based Routing in Wireless SensorNetworks. Int. J. of
Advanced Networking and Applications (2010), VOL:
02, Page: 570-580
[2] S. Jerusha, K. Kulothungan & A. Kannan ,”Location
Aware Cluster Based Routing In Wireless Sensor Networks, Int. J. of Computer & Communication
Technology ISSN: 0975-7449, Volume-3, Issue-5,
2012
[3] Inderjit S. Dhillon, Yuqiang Guan and Brian Kulis
“Kernel kmeans, Spectral Clustering and Normalized
Cuts” ACM, International Conference on knowledge
discovery and data mining 2004.
[4] Veena, K.N., Vijaya Kumar, B.P.,” Dynamic
clustering for Wireless Sensor Networks: A Neuro-
Fuzzy technique approach” International Conference
on Computational Intelligence and Computing
Research (ICCIC), No. 1-6, IEEE 2010.
[5] W. B. Heinzelman, A. P. Chandrakasan, and H.
Balakrishnan, “An application- specific protocol
architecture for wireless sensor networks,” IEEE
Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 660–670,
Oct. 2002.
[6] I. K. Samaras and G. D. Hassapis, “A modified DPWS
protocol stack for 6LoWPAN-based wireless sensor
networks,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf., vol. 9, no. 1, pp.
209–217, Feb. 2013.
