Home
Call For Papers
Submission
Author
Registration
Publications
About
Contact Us

  A Comparative Analysis on Different Image Processing Techniques for Forest Fire Detection  
  Authors : Sam G. Benjamin; Radhakrishnan B
  Cite as:

 

Image processing techniques are widely used now a day to detect fire from still images and videos. The basic technique to label a pixel as fire pixel is by analyzing its color information. One of the main setbacks of color models is that they can wrongly detect fire-colored ordinary objects as fire regions. It is very important to distinguish between fire and fire-colored ordinary objects, because generating a lot of false alarms reduces the efficiency of the fire detection system to a great extent. Various characteristics of the fire flame other than its color clues are utilized to make the fire pixel classification more precise. The fire flame has a distinctive texture characteristic than other ordinary objects, so combining the texture analysis along with the color information reduces the false alarms considerably. Another unique characteristic of the fire flame is its flickering motion. Proper classification of smoke pixels also helps to detect the fire at its initial stage. This paper is a study of different techniques that can drastically reduce the false positive rate.

 

Published In : IJCSN Journal Volume 5, Issue 1

Date of Publication : February 2016

Pages : 110-114

Figures :04

Tables : 02

Publication Link : A Comparative Analysis on Different Image Processing Techniques for Forest Fire Detection

 

 

 

Sam G. Benjamin : received his B.Tech (Information Technology) degree from University of Kerala, Trivandrum in 2010. He is currently pursuing his Masters in Computer Science & Engineering from University of Kerala. His research interests focuses on image processing, data mining, and image mining.

Radhakrishnan B : is working as Asst. Professor in computer science department. He has more than 14 years experience in teaching and has published papers on data mining and image processing. His research interests include image processing, data mining, image mining.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rule Based Color Model

Classification of Fire Pixels

Texture Analysis

Flicker Motion Analysis

Fuzzy Inference System

All the methods discussed here have good detection rate. One of the important characteristic that determines the efficiency of a fire detection system is its false positive rate. The table 1 compares the false positive rate of the different methods. Among the various methods discussed here B. Ugur Toreyin et al. [5] has the least false positive rate. Table 2 compares the output produced by three different approaches. It can be clearly seen that using color information alone wrongly labels fire colored ordinary objects as fire pixels, thereby generating a lot of false alarms. Combining color clues, motion analysis and fire flickering techniques eliminated the false positive rate to a great extent. Hence for obtaining better results, it is essential to combine multiple techniques rather than sticking onto color information alone.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[1] Turgay Celik , Hasan Demirel, “Fire detection in video sequences using a generic color model”, Fire Safety Journal (2008). [2] Turgay Celik, Huseyin Ozkaramanli, and Hasan Demirel, “Fire and smoke detection without sensors: Image processing based approach”, 15th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO 2007), Poznan, Poland, September 3-7, 2007. [3] Daniel Y. T. Chino, Letricia P. S. Avalhais, Jose F. Rodrigues Jr., Agma J. M. Traina, “BoWFire: Detection of Fire in Still Images by Integrating Pixel Color and Texture Analysis”, Proceedings of the 28th SIBGRAPI Conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images, 2015. [4] B. Ugur Toreyin, Yigithan Dedeoglu, A. Enis Cetin, “Flame Detection In Video Using Hidden Markov Models”, Bilkent University, TR-06800 Bilkent, Ankara, Turkey. [5] B. Ugur Toreyin, Yigithan Dedeoglu, Ugur Gudukbay, A. Enis Cetin, “Computer vision based method for real-time fire and flame detection”, Pattern Recognition Letters 27 (2006) 49–58. [6] T. Celik, H. Demirel, H. Ozkaramanli, “Automatic Fire Detection in Video Sequences”, 14th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO 2006), Florence, Italy, September 4-8, 2006, copyright by EURASIP. [7] Wen-Bing Horng, Jian-Wen Peng, and Chih-Yuan Chen, “A New Image-Based Real-Time Flame Detection Method Using Color Analysis”, IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control, Tucson, Arizona, USA, March 19-22, 2005. [8] Punam Patel, Shamik Tiwari, “Flame Detection Using Image Processing Techniques”, International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887) Volume 58– No.18, November 2012. [9] Turgay Celik, Huseyin Ozkaramanli, and Hasan Demirel, “Fire pixel classification using fuzzy logic and statistical color model”, Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2007. ICASSP 2007. IEEE International Conference on (Volume:1 ). [10] Peer Neubert and Peter Protzel, “Superpixel Benchmark and Comparison”, Chemnitz University of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology. [11] Norsyahirah Izzati binti Zaidi, Nor Anis Aneza binti Lokman, Mohd Razali bin Daud, Hendriyawan Achmad and Khor Ai Chia, “Fire Recognition Using Rgb And Ycbcr Color Space”, ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, VOL. 10, NO. 21, NOVEMBER 2015. [12] http://www.peterkovesi.com/projects/segmentation/ [13] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/